The Moral Compass: Navigating the Landscape of Animal Welfare and Rights
Rights philosophers argue that animals are not guinea pigs. Just as we cannot justify experimenting on a non-consenting human for medical gain, we cannot justify it for a mouse. They push for complete replacement via organoids, computer modeling, and human volunteer studies.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Harvard University Press. The Moral Compass: Navigating the Landscape of Animal
🔹 (What animals are owed)
Providing sufficient space, proper facilities, and company of the animal’s own kind. Nussbaum, M
Understanding the world of animal protection requires distinguishing between we treat animals (welfare) and why we use them at all (rights). Core Philosophical Difference
There is a lack of universal standards for animal welfare and rights, with vast disparities in how animals are treated across different cultures and countries. Frontiers of Justice: Disability
The movements for animal welfare and animal rights share the goal of protecting non-human species, but they operate on fundamentally different ethical and legal foundations.