“Ono što mi možda posmatramo nije samo kraj Hladnog rata ili prolaz jedne određene posleratne ere, već sam kraj istorije: to jest, kraj čovekove ideološke evolucije i univerzalizacija zapadne liberalne demokratije kao konačnog oblika ljudske vladavine.”
Zapadna liberalna demokratija i tržišni kapitalizam predstavljaju „krajnju tačku“ u ideološkom razvoju čovečanstva. Pobeda nad alternativama: “Ono što mi možda posmatramo nije samo kraj
Fukuyama argues that the collapse of communism and the end of the Cold War represent the final ideological victory for liberal democracy. In this context, "history" is defined as a purposeful, evolutionary process of ideological development. In 1992, Francis Fukuyama's thought-provoking book, "The End
In 1992, Francis Fukuyama's thought-provoking book, "The End of History and the Last Man," sparked a heated debate among scholars, politicians, and intellectuals worldwide. The book's central argument, that liberal democracy had triumphed over communism and other ideologies, marking the end of history, resonated with many. However, it also faced intense criticism and scrutiny. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of Fukuyama's book, exploring its main arguments, criticisms, and relevance in the contemporary world. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis
Fukuyama, a renowned American political scientist, posits that the end of the Cold War and the collapse of communist regimes marked the end of history. He contends that liberal democracy, with its emphasis on individual freedom, human rights, and free markets, has emerged as the sole victor in the struggle of ideologies. According to Fukuyama, this triumph is not only a consequence of the economic and military superiority of the West but also a result of the inherent flaws in other ideologies, such as communism and fascism.